February 14, 2000
This is a closed book exam. Only the information provided with the exam may be used. Answer each question completely but concisely. You may use lists, phrases, or sentences.
By signing below you indicate that your have been informed about and are in compliance with the policy on academic dishonesty as it is applied to this class and this exam.
Mean: 40.4
SD: 15.7
Possible: 85.0
Minimum points required to obtain listed grade:
A: 48.2
B: 32.55
C: 20.81
This exam is worth 20% of your final grade.
1. (30 points) A parade organizer is being sued by some of the “waving marchers” for repetitive motion injuries. You are serving as a consultant on the case, and have been asked to estimate the forces and moments at the elbow. You are provided with the following information for one of the plaintiffs:
Mass of hand and forearm: 2.5 kg
Length of forearm/hand: 0.5 m
Moment of intertia about elbow: 0.0127
N-m-sec2
Description of waving movement:
Rotation of the forearm at the elbow about the axis of the humerus (arm)
All motion in the coronal plane
Assume pure curvilinear motion

Kinematic
data:
|
Time (sec) |
X1 |
Y1 |
X2 |
Y2 |
|
10 |
0.05 m |
0.02 m |
0.225 m |
0.14 m |
|
10.1 |
0.045 m |
0.04 m |
0.20 m |
0.185 m |
|
10.2 |
0.04 m |
0.055 m |
0.15 m |
0.237 m |
|
10.3 |
0.03 m |
0.063 m |
0.10 m |
0.264 m |
|
10.4 |
0.02 m |
0.069 m |
0.05 m |
0.279 m |
Calculate the following:
a) The segment angle at the above 5 time points (4 points)
b) The angular velocity and acceleration of the forearm/hand complex, given the above data (6 points)
c) The force and moment at the elbow at t = 10.2 seconds (10 points)
State all assumptions that you make.
NOTE: Remember that radians are the equivalent of a unitless measure of angle.
Answer to Question 1
a. f = arctan [(yj - yi)/(xj
- xi)] (2)

t = 10 s 34.5
deg/0.601 rad
t = 10.1 s 43.1
deg/0.752 rad
t = 10.2 s 58.9
deg/1.03 rad
t = 10.3 s 70.8
deg/1.24 rad
t = 10.4 s 81.9
deg/1.42 rad
b. wI= (fI+1 – fI-1)/2Dt (3)
t = 10.1 s 122 deg/s or 2.13 rad/s
t = 10.2 s 138 deg/s or 2.42 rad/s
t = 10.3 s 115 deg/s or 2.01 rad/s
aI = (wI+1 – wI-1)/2Dt (2)
t = 10.2 s -34.9 deg/sec2 or -0.0608 rad/sec2 (+9)
c. SM = Ia (2)
mg*(0.5L*sinf) + M = Ia (3)
2.5 kg*9.8 m/s2*0.5*0.5 m * cos(58.9) + M = 0.0127 N-m-sec^2* (-0.608 rad/sec2)
M = -3.17 N-m (clockwise) (2)
SF = ma (2)
Choice 1 (simple):
a = 0 (pure curvilinear motion) (1)
Rx = 0
mg + Ry = 0 (2)
2.5 kg * 9.8 m/s2 = Ry Ry = 24.5 N (2)
Choice 2 (accurate dynamics)
SFx = m(-rCGw2) (1)
SFy = mrCGa
SFx = Rx = 2.5 kg*(-0.25 m * (2.42 rad/s)2)
Rx = -3.66 N
SFy = Ry – mg = mra
Ry = 2.5 kg * 0.25 m * 0.6 rad/s2 + 2.5 kg * 9.81 m/s2
Ry
= 24.88 N
2. (10 points) Explain what is happening to the foot with respect to the leg during normal walking, as is described by the following plot. Use anatomically correct terms for planes and motions. Based on the accompanying leg motion figure, sketch an equivalent plot for foot segment angle (general patterns only).
Variation in
ankle joint angle with time within the sagittal plane during normal gait.

The 1st graph portrays the change in ankle
angle with time.
At initial
contact, foot is slightly plantarflexed (1)
As gait moves through mid-stance and terminal stance, foot increases the degree of dorsiflexion (1)
As swing begins, foot plantarflexes , but plantarflexion decreases during mid-swing in order to clear the toe (2)
Foot
Angle w/r/t ground
(5)
3. (15 points) Two patients present to
your diagnostic laboratory for assessment of bone loss and fracture risk. Using experimental techniques, you are
able to make the following measurements in the spine: (NOTE: Reduced to 10 points)
|
Measurement |
Patient A |
Patient B |
|
Bone Density |
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
Mean Trabecular Plate Separation |
Vertical Axis: 200 µm Horizontal Axis: 250 µm |
Vertical Axis: 500 µm Horizontal Axis: 250 µm |
|
Mean Trabecular Plate Thickness |
Vertical Axis: 150 µm Horizontal Axis: 200 µm |
Vertical Axis: 250 µm Horizontal Axis: 250 µm |
Describe the progression of the bone loss seen in the two patients and compare your assessment of their fracture risk. Why would you expect this difference in fracture risk? Other than bone properties, what other risk factors would you assess to further enhance your estimate of fracture risk?
(6 points based on first 2 sections)
Patient
A: Thinning of trabeculae
with maintenance of trabecular spacing; greater spacing between vertical
beams than horizontal struts
Patient
B: Loss of horizontal
trabeculae with maintenance of trabecular thickness. Space between vertical beams remains
normal.
(2)
Patient A has less risk of fracture than Patient B. While their densities are the same,
Patient B has experienced a greater loss of the 3D connectivity in the
trabecular structure. As the horizontal
connecting struts are lost, the vertical beams are more likely to fail
by buckling.
Other risk factors: (4)
Low
body weight/low soft tissue thickness
Tendancy
to fall (cognitive impairment/balance impairment)
Increased
height
Increased
fall severity
3. (5 points) It is known that when a trabeculae is completely perforated during bone remodeling it can not be replaced/reconnected. What basic rule of bone physiology underlies this phenomenon? (Provide both the name of the rule and a brief description). What experiment would you design to assess the validity of this rule?
Wolff’s Law
– Bone remodels in response to the load that it sees (3)
Experiment (2) –
an experiment based on increasing or decreasing loading in the bones
4. (20 points) A nursing aid is being assessed for low back pain in your clinic. One of her main tasks is bed making. She reports that she often leans over the bed to tuck sheets in on the far side. You want to analyze the forces and moments at the L5 lumbar disc seen in her technique compared to the “proper” technique. See the attached figure for clarification.
Information:
Weight of head and trunk: 340 N
Weight of arms: 60 N
Moment arms
Bending over – arms c-of-g: 0.67 m
Bending over – body c-of-g: 0.31 m
Upright – arms c-of-g: 0.18 m
Upright – body c-of-g: 0.17 m
Erector spinae: 0.05 m
Angle of inclination of L5 disc
Bending over: 70 deg
Upright: 30 deg
a. How large is the bending moment on the L5 disc when the patient is making the bed while bending over? While standing upright?
b. How large must the erector spinae muscle force be to counteract the bending moment for both cases?
c. How large will the compressive and shear force on the L5 disc be in the two cases. Assume that the line of application of the erector spinae muscle force is perpendicular to the disc, independent of its degree of inclination.
a. SM
= 0 (1)
Bending over: 340
N * 0.31 m + 60 N * 0.67 m + M = 0
(2)
M
= - 145.6 N-m (clockwise)
Upright: 340
N * 0.17 m + 60 N * 0.18 m +M = 0
(2)
M
= - 68.6 N-m (clockwise)
b. FES
= M/0.05 m
Bending
over: FES
= - 2912 N (1)
Upright: FES
= - 1372 N (1)
d. SF = 0 (1) Arrange
axes in line with disc (2)
Bending
over: FES
+ 340 N * cos(70) + 60 N * cos(70) + RC = 0 (2)
RC
= 3049 N (1)
340
N * sin(70) + 60 N *sin(70) + RS = 0 (2)
RS
= 375 N (1)
Upright: FES
+ 340 N * cos(30) + 60 N * cos(30) + RC = 0 (1)
RC
= 1718 N (1)
340
N * sin(30) + 60 N * sin(30) + RS = 0 (1)
RS
= 200 N (1)
5. (5 points) You are designing an impact test to assess the properties of the bones of the leg for crash simulations. Due to the low availability of cadaveric tissue, you decide to use your first cadaver to estimate the input variables for your study. You insert load cells into the tibia and femur, slowly apply a deformation up to 2 cm at a strain rate of 0.01 sec-1 and measure the force in the bones. Based on this information, you determine that you can deform the bones by the same 2 cm in your impact test at 10 sec –1. However, when you conduct your test, the bones fracture and the failure loads measured by the load cells are higher than was seen in your pre-test. Why did this occur?
Bone is viscoelastic
(2). At the higher deformation
rate, the applied deformation would induce a higher load in the bone. At higher deformation rates, bone is
stiffer and will fail at higher loads, but lower deformations. (3)
6. (5 points)Optimization techniques in kinetic and kinematic analysis often make use of the theory of maximum muscle force. Explain why an optimization technique would be needed. Describe the main idea behind the theory of maximum muscle force.
Optimization
techniques are used for indeterminant static and dynamic problems when there
are more unknowns than equations – typically when the goal is to solve
for forces in multiple muscles. (2)
Maximum
muscle force theory comes from the idea that each muscle force is capable of
exerting a maximum force/unit area.
Based on the physiological cross-sectional area of the muscle and this
maximum stress level, the maximum force can be calculated. In optimization theories, this can be
modeled as each model acting only until its maximum force is reached. The first muscle is recruited, based on
the maximum product of cross-sectional area and moment arm length, and other
muscles are recruited in descending order of A*L once each previous muscle has
reached its maximum force. (3)